Burn multiple: how to calculate it and what investors expect
The burn multiple tells you how much cash your company burns for every dollar of new recurring revenue. In 2025, the median for unprofitable software companies with $10–100 million in annual recurring revenue (ARR) was 1.7x, according to ICONIQ's State of Software 2025. In 2022 it was 3.0x. The bar got tighter, and founders who walk into a VC meeting with this number ready stand out.
What the burn multiple is
David Sacks of Craft Ventures popularized the metric in 2020:
Burn multiple = net burn ÷ net new ARR
In Sacks's own example, a startup burned $2 million in a quarter and added $1 million of ARR: a 2x burn multiple. Every dollar of new revenue cost two dollars of cash.
The bands investors use
Under 1x: excellent efficiency.
1x to 2x: spend turns into growth at a workable rate.
2x to 3x: each dollar of new ARR costs two to three dollars of cash.
Above 3x: a red flag unless growth is exceptional.
Stage matters. Sacks notes that a seed-stage company may sit at 3x simply because it just started selling. What investors want to see is the number falling quarter after quarter.

What changed since 2022
ICONIQ's median burn multiple for unprofitable software companies with $10–100 million in ARR:
2022: 3.0x
2023: 1.9x
2024: 1.9x
2025: 1.7x
Above $100 million in ARR, the 2025 median was 0.7x, and top-quartile companies tend to stay under 1.0x after passing $10 million in ARR.

Example: running your own numbers
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE, using assumptions from High Alpha's 2025 SaaS Benchmarks Report: in the $1–5 million ARR band, median monthly burn was $175,000 and median annual ARR growth was 50%.
Take a company with $3 million in ARR growing 50% a year:
Net new ARR per quarter: $1.5 million ÷ 4 = $375,000.
Net burn per quarter: $175,000 × 3 = $525,000.
Burn multiple: 525 ÷ 375 = 1.4x.
That sits in the healthy band. If growth drops to 25% with the same burn, the number climbs to 2.8x.
4 steps to bring yours down before you raise
Measure quarterly, not monthly. Monthly numbers swing too much and hide the trend.
Split product burn from sales burn. Product spend has a timeline; sales spend has a measurable return.
Cut the channel with the worst return first. Use CAC, LTV and payback to find it.
Show the trend in your deck. Four quarters of a falling number say more than one good number.
Do this math with cash to spare: raising on a short runway weakens your hand, and the 2026 funding bar asks for more traction per round.
These figures come from US software companies. Use them as a reference, not a fixed target for your sector.
Informational content only; not an investment recommendation.
Sources
ICONIQ, State of Software 2025 (Sep 2025): https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/65d0d38fc4ec8ce8a8921654/68b8696eb46a99918d197637_ICONIQ_Analytics_State_of_Software_2025.pdf
David Sacks, Craft Ventures, The Burn Multiple (Apr 23, 2020): https://sacks.substack.com/p/the-burn-multiple-51a7e43cb200
CRV, What is a Burn Multiple? (Sep 4, 2026): https://www.crv.com/content/burn-multiple
High Alpha, 2025 SaaS Benchmarks Report: https://2994607.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/2994607/2025%20SaaS%20Benchmarks%20Report.pdf
Leia em português: https://blog.kurumiventures.com/post/burn-multiple-como-calcular




Comments